News

+ back to CMLive
May 1st, 2013

NY Times: In an Overhaul, Clorox Aims to Get Green Works Out of Its Niche

Green Works, Clorox’s line of environmentally friendly housecleaning products, is using Earth Day to introduce a fund-raising promotion on Twitter as part of an overall revamp of its marketing strategy.

The brand — introduced in 2008 with a controversial endorsement by the Sierra Club — has carried prices at least 20 percent higher than traditional housecleaning products and has been promoted with retailers’ natural and organic products.

In January, however, Green Works recommended that retailers eliminate its price premium and promote its products with traditional housecleaning products. The new policies will be phased in starting this summer.

Clorox’s contract with the Sierra Club, which involved a $1.3 million payment to the environmental organization, will expire this December; the Sierra Club logo, which has appeared on all Green Works packaging, will be eliminated from new, bolder packaging that will begin appearing this summer as part of the overhauled marketing strategy.

The new strategy — which Green Works’ brand manager, Shekinah Eliassen, said was meant to promote its products as being “affordable, effective, accessible and approachable” — no doubt stems from a precipitous decline in sales.

An August 2012 report on environmentally friendly cleaning products in the United States by Packaged Facts, a market research company, said that although Green Works’ dollar sales jumped more than 50 percent in 2009 to $53 million, they had fallen to $32 million for the year ending May 13, 2012, based on data from the IRI Group.

Similarly, Packaged Facts estimated that although Green Works generated about 20 percent of all dollar sales in the green household cleaner category in 2009, that figure had fallen to 13 percent in May last year, according to IRI Group data.

“When Green Works was first launched, it came out of the gate with a lot of investment by Clorox,” said Jason Gere, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets. “Initially it started to do well, but then the macroeconomic environment took over. Clorox realized that in this consumer-led recession, having products even as environmentally friendly as Green Works’ are, but charging a 20 percent-plus premium to conventional cleaners, was not working.”

The line’s association with Clorox also may have been detrimental, said Ali Dibadj, a senior analyst at Sanford Bernstein. He said the connection meant Green Works “did not appeal to the classic green consumer. So they’re deciding to go after conventional consumers at a lower price point.”

Mr. Gere, who estimated that Green Works likely generates about 5 percent of Clorox’s total sales, said the company had “done themselves a favor by adjusting the price gaps, and with Green Works sold in the cleaning section with traditional products, consumers probably will be willing to try it to see if they like it.”

According to Kantar Media, Clorox spent more than $25 million a year on advertising by DDB, part of the Omnicom Group, for Green Works in 2008 and 2009, the vast majority on television and magazine advertising. Kantar Media said that figure dropped to almost $600,000 — spent mostly on Internet advertising — in 2011, a figure that doubled to $1.2 million last year.

Rebecca Boston, Green Works’ public relations and digital strategist, said the brand decided last year to aim its marketing at “digitally savvy” mothers, ages 18 to 49, “who spend a lot of time online. That’s where we needed to reach them.”

To that end, Green Works hired Calgary, Alberta-based Critical Mass, a digital agency controlled by the Omnicom Group, to develop an advertising strategy driven primarily by social media; officials said Clorox would spend $10 million on the campaign through mid-2014.

Green Works is celebrating Earth Day on Monday with a program that will let Twitter users post a joke to Green Works’ Twitter account. For every Twitter post through the end of May, Green Works will donate a dollar, up to $20,000, to the Environmental Media Association’s school gardens project. The tagline of the initiative is, “You don’t have to be serious to be green.”

In January, Green Works introduced a YouTube series called “Green Housewives,” which parodies people who have made being environmentally correct a status symbol. In February, Green Works ran a “Tweethearts” campaign that allowed participants to send environmentally friendly, virtual Valentine’s Day cards via Twitter. The March social media initiative was a six-second game of charades on Vine, a video clip app, for St. Patrick’s Day; its message was, “You don’t have to put on a charade to be green.”

Chris Gokiert, president of Critical Mass, said the social media initiatives — which are being promoted with digital banner advertising — are intended to “help customers become owners of and advocates for the brand.”

The campaign also involves a new Green Works Web site, introduced in January, and magazine advertising in April, May and June issues of women’s magazines and People. One ad says, “You don’t have to be perfect to be green,” while another says, “You don’t have to be a trust fund baby to be green.”

Kevin Tuerff, president of EnviroMedia, an Austin-based environmental marketing company, said the new social media strategy could “enhance brand awareness, though it may not translate into sales.”

Wendy Nicholson, who follows Clorox for Citi, said organic personal care products generally have been more successful than organic household products. “People tend to care more about all-natural, organic products going into the body, as opposed to being used on their dishes or clothes,” she said.

Read the article on NY Times.

April 4th, 2013

What Your Brand Needs to Know About Facebook’s Latest Tweaks

As much as Facebook is a significant part of the marketing mix for many brands, keeping up with Zuckerberg’s constant tinkering with policies, layouts and ad platform is a little overwhelming.  While the introduction of Graph Search was met with indifference, the latest changes announced to the News Feed and user Timeline have significantly more implications for Brand Pages.

With this in mind, the Critical Mass social media team has published a whitepaper to help brands understand the significance of The Social Network’s latest tweaks and provided an action plan for what to do now and what to consider for the future.

Check it out here on SlideShare.

 

March 8th, 2013

CM at SXSW

Critical Mass is hitting up SxSW again this year, sending a crew to take in the trends, technology and trough-loads of BBQ in Austin! Be sure to catch our CM panels and tune in to see if we win the SxSW Interactive Award for our Nissan Pathfinder Kinect Experience. Hope to see you there!

Confessions of a Community Moderator

Monday, March 11, 5:00-6:00pm

Presenters:

Chris Gokiert, President, Critical Mass

Kim Matlock, Senior Director Digital & Consumer Marketing, Hard Rock

Kristin Rupert, Social Media Manager, Imagination

Liz Kannenberg, Director Social Media, Walton Isaacson

Back by popular demand, we bring you Community Confessions. Double agent. First Responder. Cheerleader. They’re all fair descriptors of the now prevalent role of Community Manager. Whether you are one yourself or just morbidly curious about “the man behind the curtain,” you know there are incredible stories from those who have the rare opportunity to interact with both the brand and the customers. No matter how much they love their communities, moderators have their fair share of “I can’t believe this is happening” moments. All in real time. Returning for the second year, we’re here to confirm you are not alone. With moderators from Hard Rock, Betty Crocker and Jim Beam, we’ll come together to share, commiserate and learn about the latest and greatest best practices in technology, fan management, governance and more from those representing a diverse array of brands. Come for the vent session; stay for the camaraderie and tips for staying sane.

 

Warhol Goes Social: Creativity in the Tech Age

Tuesday, March 12, 3:30-4:30pm

Presenters:

Christiaan Welzel, Associate Creative Director, Critical Mass

David Jones, VP Social, Critical Mass

Laurie Frick, Artist, LaurieFrick.com

Mitch Goodwin, Media Artist, ScreenCulture.com

Today, everyone is a “Creative.” With the boom of visually-based social platforms like Instagram and Pinterest, technology has leveled the playing field. Does this really change how we define art and creativity? Artistic purists believe these tools cheapen the creative output with seventeen standard filters available to every untrained eye. But in true entrepreneurial spirit, those apps encourage a more democrative view of creativity, allowing user to share their inspiration with their friends and create beauty where it previously would have been impossible. Is there a difference between high-brow and low-brow art in relation to what social media enables everyone to create?

This panel will begin to tackle this debate, considering the very latest tools and trends, and arguing the new definition of creativity in the tech age.

February 12th, 2013

Agile Development + Content Strategy: An Opportunity or Headache?

Blog Post written by Gareth Morgan

Over the past 12 months, Critical Mass has integrated agile development practices into some of our client engagements. Instead of doing most of the content strategy and execution ourselves, we collaborate with the client to discover and build something together. Is agile an opportunity or a headache for the client-agency relationship? Yes and yes. Like any new way of getting work done, there are benefits and drawbacks to consider. Agile development has a relatively short history in the agency world, so many of us have a lot of lessons to learn. Nonetheless, here are three nuggets of wisdom we picked up along the way.

1. Get to know the fundamentals of agile
Agile is not the latest marketing craze or trendy buzzword. Its origins date back to the 1970s, in the field of software development. Thousands of successful titles have been built with agile methodologies. Take time to understand theagile manifesto and twelve principles, as well as some of agile’s benefits and terminology. If your organization has already kicked off an agile project, it won’t be uncommon to overhear a comment like, “We need to timebox this next acceptance test otherwise our velocity won’t allow time for that spike we need.” Wait, what? (It’s all geek to me!) To become an effective contributor, learn the lingo and key tenets before diving in.

This learning exercise will bring you towards a deeper appreciation of the opportunity/headache issue mentioned earlier. Agile’s clarion calls sound appealing: Faster turnarounds, lower costs, better quality products, happier team members. These promises dazzle many executives. What’s not to like? Yet a superficial understanding of agile does not usually uncover the method’s challenges and pitfalls relating to content development, particularly when you drill down to how your specific project is going to be run.

As we discovered, many challenges arose when the key agile tenets came into conflict with our actual workflows and processes. This wasn’t surprising, considering we took a paradigm for software development out of its native home and pushed it into uncharted territory, with new players and stakeholders from multiple disciplines. If agile teams work best by having daily stand-up meetings and face-to-face interactions, what happens if we build a larger team with people dispersed across the country? Could our clients really embrace thehigher level of uncertainty around deadlines, budgets and feature scope that comes with agile? How would we keep our content quality and user experience standards high while also rushing to crank out a “minimum viable product?” Would our familiar (or subconscious) preferences for traditional waterfall methods and command/control decision-making sabotage our efforts? How would we interact with other stakeholders who aren’t yet trained (or sold) on the agile process? These questions and many others continue to loom large. Arming ourselves with knowledge and self-awareness helped mitigate some of the friction.

2. Define the engagement model, roles and responsibilities
If agency and client staff intend to collaborate and build something through

a joint partnership, defining the engagement model is crucial. Who will come up with the content strategy? Manage the production? How will tasks be divvied up among the contributors? Who is responsible for developing the big-picture experience vision, and maintaining fidelity to that vision? Who needs to review and approve the various outputs? Who has the final say on decisions large and small? Don’t kick off an agile project without considering these important questions.

Go a step further and make clear the specific roles and responsibilities of the contributors. Agile can often fall down in this area, possibly due to its origins as a software development process, practiced mostly by developers. Back there, most participants were from the same discipline background, understood each other’s language, and were knowledgeable enough to critique and improve one another’s work. In contrast, our agile teams were staffed with developers, content people, information architects, designers and business advisors. With repeated forays into agile we improved our working relationships, but our first attempts resulted in some wheel-spinning. Not only were there too many cooks, the egalitarian atmosphere led to lots of unproductive discussion.

Promote cooperation, challenge ideas and critique peers, but don’t let the pendulum swing from the old command/control paradigm into the Wild West where there are no experts and everything gets decided collectively. Do you want team members collaborating effectively, challenging each other and using their skills to assemble a great product? Absolutely. Do you want five developers taking valuable meeting time dissecting and debating your copywriter’s verbiage choices on every button and banner? No, you do not. You assign specialists and experts to your project for a reason. Make sure the team dynamics allow them to apply their strengths and contribute value. If not, your product will start to display the unwanted hairy hump and leathery lips of the committee camel.

3. Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water
Passionate agile advocates can get adamant and dogmatic in their opposition to waterfall approaches. Believe me, I get it: reading a project requirements brief that runs 100+ pages is a painful purgatory, second only to the experience of the poor soul who was tasked with writing it. Again, the promises of agile sound winsome: Excessive documentation and process is bad! Just dive in and build something! Embrace flexible requirements! Working software is the primary measure of progress! Fail fast, learn faster! But while software companies have enjoyed success with these principles, to what extent will they work in other fields?

I recall a telling conversation with an agile coach where I suggested we pause to get some technical feasibility input from an external stakeholder. Wouldn’t it be smarter, I said, to find out now what the limitations are around the content management system we hope to build? “No,” he replied, reemphasizing the need for the team to simply crank out working software, the primary measure of progress. Limitations and obstacles would be figured out later. I pressed him further: What if our agile team spends weeks inventing a clever product that can never work on the current system limitations? He appeared nonplussed by the question, gave a vague response, then returned to his same mantras.

The most successful content strategists I know apply conventional, non-agile methods to deliver extraordinary digital experiences. There’s a reason we tackle projects this way: it works. We act quickly, we’re flexible and certainly not bureaucratic, but we like to invest time before production in planning and strategic thinking, which produces insights and approaches that ultimately drive the creation of great products. There is a lot to like about agile development, and since it’s not going away any time soon, we need to get better at harnessing its strengths. That doesn’t mean turning away from other tried-and-true practices that will continue to serve us well in the future. We’re still on the journey of discovering how to best work with agile, as part of our commitment to pursuing quality work and better ways of doing it. If you are also on the journey, learn from our experience: Whatever form of implementation agile takes at your organization, make sure there is time and space allocated for some up-front content strategy work, before the sprints begin.

 

January 16th, 2013

Upcoming Events in 2013

We’re kicking off the year with a number of speaking engagements covering everything from multi-screen experiences to data-driven marketing and real-time media buying. Join us to hear CM’s perspective on this rapidly changing digital landscape.

Jan. 17, 6:30-8:30pm ET

“Television & Digital Collide: Marketing in a Multi-screen World” – American Marketing Association, Toronto Chapter

Digital ad spend is set to overtake TV ad spend, but many marketers still treat their TV plans & digital plans as separate entities. The proliferation of screens, along with TV programming available on smartphones and tablets, has allowed consumers to change their viewing habits and behaviour- they watch their favourite shows when they want, where they want. CM’s SVP GM Matt Di Paola will sit on this interactive panel discussion about marketing in a multi-screen world.

Jan. 23, 11:30-12:15pm

“The One True View: Leveraging Data to Embrace the Customer Experience” -  OMMA Data-Driven Marketing Conference

It is not about the channel experience anymore. Big data makes possible a holistic view of a consumer “journey,” that is bigger and more personal than simply being online, in-store, on mobile, or watching TV. That 360-degree or “one true view” of that customer can inform how messaging is crafted and timed according to the user’s path, not the platform. It demands a new understanding of a consumer “lifecycle” and data that drives marketers towards the right touch points. Shaina Boone, VP Marketing Science, joins this panel of marketing practitioners shares examples of how data is best being used to understand and enhance the customer experience and the challenges of creating that “one true view.”

Jan. 24, 3:30-4:15pm

“Getting to RTB 2.0: Solving for Quality, Viewability and Cost of Sale” – OMMA Real-Time Buying Conference

In order for automated platforms to move to the next level of market penetration and brand adoption, there are persistent problems waiting for solutions. Inventory quality continues to struggle against its reputation as a bargain basement of remnants. The value chain is so complex and multi-layered that too many players take too much of the price, often escalating a publisher’s true cost of sale. And many media brands, the holders of the best inventory and user data, remain suspicious of the entire RTB and data re-selling enterprise. Industry pundits and metrics providers promise that a new “viewable impression” metric will bring welcome scarcity, trust and price support into the ecosystem, but disagreement remains over its implementation and real effect. Despite the velocity of RTB growth, the marketplace has critical hurdles to vault in order to convince the core constituencies, brands and publishers, that RTB really is ready for prime time. CM’s Director of Marketing & Media, Joel Nierman, joins this panel on RTB.

Jan. 28

“Advertising Across Screens” – Contagious Panel at Toronto Adweek

Smartphones and tablets have changed everything. Instead of an uneven ebb and flow of internet connectivity throughout the day, consumers now carry their connection with them. Smart devices have closed the gaps in connectivity, creating a seamless, ever-present, ever-changing experience. How should your brand adapt to this shift?

Join CM SVP GM Matt Di Paola and Yahoo! Canada and learn from industry leaders, doers, and re-engineers of the web on how to take advantage of the marketing opportunities created by smartphones, tablets and television.